Back to Blog

How We Built an AI Customer Support System That Handles 10K Queries Daily

A deep dive into our journey building and deploying an AI-powered customer support system for a major e-commerce platform.

Jordan Lee

@jordanlee_ai
January 2, 2025
4 min read
Share:

Building an AI Customer Support System at Scale

When our client, a major e-commerce platform, approached us with the challenge of handling 10,000+ daily customer queries, we knew we needed to build something special. This is the story of how we designed, built, and deployed an AI-powered customer support system that reduced response times by 80% while maintaining high customer satisfaction.

The Challenge

The existing support system was struggling:

  • Average response time: 4+ hours
  • Customer satisfaction: 3.2/5 stars
  • Support cost: $15 per ticket
  • Agent burnout: High turnover rate

Our goal was to automate 70% of queries while improving the customer experience.

Project Scope

  • Handle 10,000+ queries daily
  • Support 5 languages
  • Integrate with existing CRM
  • Maintain 90%+ accuracy on automated responses

System Architecture

We designed a multi-tier architecture to handle different query complexities:

Tier 1: Instant Resolution

Simple queries like order status, return policies, and FAQs are handled instantly using a fine-tuned model with RAG.

Tier 2: AI-Assisted

More complex queries get AI-generated responses that human agents review before sending.

Tier 3: Human Escalation

Sensitive issues (refunds over $500, complaints) are routed directly to human agents with AI-provided context.

Key Technical Decisions

Why RAG Over Fine-Tuning Alone

We initially considered fine-tuning a model on historical support conversations. However, we found that:

  1. Knowledge updates: Product info changes frequently
  2. Accuracy: RAG provided better factual accuracy
  3. Cost: Cheaper than constantly re-training

Our final approach combined both: a fine-tuned base model for tone and structure, with RAG for factual information.

retrieval.py
python
class SupportRetriever:
    def __init__(self):
        self.product_index = VectorStore("products")
        self.policy_index = VectorStore("policies")
        self.faq_index = VectorStore("faqs")
 
    def retrieve(self, query: str, category: str) -> List[Document]:
        # Select appropriate index based on query category
        index = self._select_index(category)
 
        # Hybrid search: semantic + keyword
        semantic_results = index.similarity_search(query, k=5)
        keyword_results = index.keyword_search(query, k=3)
 
        # Rerank and deduplicate
        return self.reranker.rerank(
            query,
            semantic_results + keyword_results,
            top_k=3
        )

Intent Classification

Before generating responses, we classify the customer's intent:

IntentExamplesHandling
Order Status"Where's my order?"Tier 1 - API lookup
Return Request"I want to return..."Tier 1 - Policy + form
Product Question"Does this fit..."Tier 1 - RAG
Complaint"This is unacceptable..."Tier 3 - Human
Technical Issue"App is crashing..."Tier 2 - AI + review

Results After 6 Months

The impact exceeded our expectations:

Key Metrics

  • Response time: 4 hours → 45 minutes (89% improvement)
  • Automation rate: 72% of queries resolved without human intervention
  • Customer satisfaction: 3.2 → 4.4 stars
  • Cost per ticket: $15 → $4.50 (70% reduction)
  • Agent satisfaction: Improved (handling interesting cases only)

Query Resolution Breakdown

After deployment, we tracked where queries were being handled:

Lessons Learned

What Worked Well

  1. Gradual rollout: Started with 10% of traffic, scaled up over 8 weeks
  2. Human-in-the-loop: Agents reviewed AI responses initially, providing feedback
  3. Continuous learning: Weekly model updates based on new patterns
  4. Clear escalation paths: Customers could always reach a human

What We'd Do Differently

  1. Earlier investment in monitoring: We underestimated the importance of real-time quality metrics
  2. More diverse training data: Initial model struggled with non-English queries
  3. Better handoff experience: The transition from AI to human could be smoother
Terminal
$support-analytics summary --period 30d
Support System Analytics (Last 30 Days)Total Queries: 312,456
Automated: 224,968 (72%)
AI-Assisted: 62,491 (20%)
Human Only: 24,997 (8%)Avg Response Time: 43 minutes
Customer Satisfaction: 4.4/5.0
Cost per Ticket: $4.52Top Intents:
Order Status (34%)
Product Questions (28%)
Return/Refund (18%)
Account Issues (12%)
Other (8%)

Technical Implementation Details

Response Generation Pipeline

pipeline.py
python
async def generate_response(query: CustomerQuery) -> Response:
    # 1. Classify intent
    intent = await classifier.predict(query.text)
 
    # 2. Check if escalation needed
    if should_escalate(intent, query):
        return escalate_to_human(query)
 
    # 3. Retrieve relevant context
    context = await retriever.retrieve(
        query.text,
        category=intent.category
    )
 
    # 4. Generate response
    response = await llm.generate(
        prompt=build_prompt(query, context, intent),
        max_tokens=500,
        temperature=0.3  # Lower for consistency
    )
 
    # 5. Safety checks
    if not safety_filter.is_safe(response):
        return escalate_to_human(query)
 
    # 6. Confidence check
    if response.confidence < 0.85:
        return Response(
            text=response.text,
            needs_review=True
        )
 
    return response

Future Improvements

We're currently working on:

  1. Voice support: Extending to phone calls
  2. Proactive outreach: Anticipating issues before customers complain
  3. Personalization: Tailoring responses based on customer history
  4. Multi-modal: Handling images (damaged products, receipts)

Conclusion

Building an AI customer support system is as much about process as it is about technology. The key to our success was:

  • Starting small and iterating
  • Keeping humans in the loop
  • Measuring everything
  • Listening to customer and agent feedback

If you're considering a similar project, feel free to reach out. We're happy to share more details about our approach.

Related Posts